Filter by Category
- Appeal
- Crown Court
- Exceptional Hardship
- Fail to Identify
- Magistrates Court
- Private Hire Appeal
- Single Justice Procedure
- Special Reasons
Driving Without Due Care – Driver escapes with only 4 penalty points. - March 2022
This driver, represented before the Magistrates by barrister Millicent Dooher, was facing up to 9 penalty points or a disqualification following the offence of careless driving (without due care and attention). As this offence occurred within the first 2 years that this driver has held a licence, 6 or more […]
Professional Driver Retains Licence Despite Being a Totter - March 2022
This driver was represented by Helen Newbold in the Magistrates’ court where he was facing a disqualification of his licence after pleading guilty to a speeding offence. With 9 points on his licence at the time of the offence this driver faced automatic disqualification under the totting rules for accumulating […]
Successful s.172 trial: Unable to identify driver between husband or wife. - February 2022
Millicent Dooher represented this client at their Magistrates Court trial for failing to identify the driver of a vehicle following a speeding offence. The defence for this charge is whether the recipient has acted with reasonable diligence in ascertaining the identity of the driver and providing it to the police. […]
Drink Driver over 4 Times the Limit Avoids Immediate Custody - February 2022
Millicent Dooher, barrister, represented this driver at his sentencing hearing following an offence of drink driving. With such a high reading, the starting point is immediate custody. Millicent was able to convince the Magistrates not to impose immediate custody due to the mitigating factors, including the work the driver had […]
Driver with 14 Penalty Points Avoids Disqualification - February 2022
This driver, who at the time of the last offence had 9 penalty points endorsed upon his licence, was before the Court for a further driving offence, carrying a mandatory 4-6 penalty points or 7–28 day disqualification. This driver was represented at the Magistrates Court by barrister, Millicent Dooher. The […]
HGV Operator with 12 Penalty Points for Speeding Gets No Disqualification. - December 2021
This driver, who is also an operator of HGVs, was represented at the Magistrates’ Court by barrister, Millicent Dooher following 4 offences of speeding amounting to 12 penalty points. With 12 penalty points, the starting point is a mandatory 6-month disqualification from driving. Millicent was able to make a successful […]
Speeding Totter Avoids 6 Month Ban with Short Disqualification - November 2021
Millicent Dooher, barrister, represented this car driver following a speeding offence, where the driver was recorded as travelling at 86-mph in a 50-mph restricted zone. This could carry a sentence of up to 56 days driving disqualification, or 6 penalty points. This driver already had 6 penalty points endorsed upon […]
Successful Special Reasons Hearing – No Points, No Fine and No Prosecution Costs Payable. - October 2021
Millicent Dooher, barrister, represented this client at the special reasons hearing following a speeding offence where the driver’s speedometer was showing a faulty reading. Millicent was able to prove that the speedometer was faulty and persuade the Magistrates to deal with this by way of absolute discharge. This meant the […]
Company Director Escapes Endorsement by Amendment of Charge After Failing to Provide Driver Information - September 2021
This Company Director was before the Magistrates’ Court following 2 charges of failing to provide driver details following speeding offences committed in his Company vehicles (under s.172 Road Traffic Act 1988). Each offence carries 6 penalty points and a fine, making him a ‘totter’ and putting his Company out of […]
Careless Driver Avoids Disqualification - September 2021
Motoring lawyer Laura Newton represented a driver before the Magistrates’ Court, facing a charge of careless driving. The driver had been witnessed by police aggressively weaving in and out of traffic and travelling at excess speed. The case had begun in the Single Justice Procedure Court but adjourned as the […]
